I have little to no interest in investing in gloom/doom, and history is the reason why.
The biggest difference I see between gold and stocks is that one is based on negative gloom/doom thinking, and the other is based on positive/growth thinking.
#Funny freestyle lyrics free
But does that actually mean the 3.1GHz Core i5 in the 27" is actually cheaper than the slower 2.7GHz Core i5 in the 27"? Intel doesn't sell a 2.7GHz standard voltage Core i5 unless its a custom model or Apple is underclocking the 2.8GHz Core i5, which seems like an unnecessary waste of free clock speed room.Underclock and relabel is not anything new. The 2.5GHz and 2.7GHz models look to be Low-Voltage 65W Core i5, which is why Apple is able to fit quad cores in the 21.5" enclosure. Though the 24" with 7300/7600GT does stand out. The GPU may only have 256MB dedicated memory but at least it's not mobile.They have been mobile since the switch to Intel. As my i3 processor practically acts like a quad core anyway and is virtually never pushed to it's limits I think I'm more than happy with what I have. THAT's how they've been able to bring us them processors and still keep the price down. At first glance I was really annoyed as the �999 one (which is what I got before the refresh) had an i5 quad core, then I saw the graphics memory and got even more annoyed, but THEN I noticed the large shiny M at the end of the GPU name. So, you see, while there's an upside (the processors), it doesn't come without a down (the GPUs).
#Funny freestyle lyrics full
In the last line of iMacs they were full powered desktop GPUs. The Graphics Cards in EVERY model are now mobile.
The way they've been able to keep the price low while using quad-cores in EVERY iMac has been by downgrading the GPUs.
Really this is a wonderful new breakthrough in Apple's quest for computing easiness. In fact, I hope they expand this functionality to include upgrading ram and hard disks (as long as they don't go overboard with the prices like in the b.t.o. Making the entire computer experience simple, easy and fun is what Apple has always been about, and this is a natural continuation of those ideals. If I had an OS X button to buy a new battery when I wanted one, rather than tracking down the battery model number I needed and having to worry about who to buy from and bothering with technical details, I'd definitely appreciate being able to just click that button. But I think this is a very Apple thing to do and a feature that isn't just a built in advertisement. I'm hardly an Apple apologist, I complain quite loudly when they do things that are lame. This is probably not the first time an option to buy hardware has been built into software, but just like Time Machine is revolutionary because it's the first SIMPLE file-by-file backup system and not because it's the first backup system ever, so too this "Buy Battery" button is revolutionary because of how simple and integrated it is. Apple has always been about making a totally integrated, complete end-to-end computing environment and Apple has also always been dedicated to transforming things that had been difficult for non-techies to do into some so simple and effective that even advanced technical users decide it's the best method. Is anyone else bothered by the button to buy more batteries?
0 kommentar(er)
